WHY WAS EMMANUEL FORBES EJECTED COMMANDERS ROOKIE CONTROVERSIALLY TOSSED FOR HIT ON SEAHAWKS TYLER LOCKETT

Why was Emmanuel Forbes ejected Commanders rookie controversially tossed for hit on Seahawks Tyler Lockett

Why was Emmanuel Forbes ejected Commanders rookie controversially tossed for hit on Seahawks Tyler Lockett

Blog Article

Commanders cornerback Emmanuel Forbes was sent to the bench twice earlier this season, but the rookie made strides with a strong performance against the Patriots in Week 9. That momentum was halted on Sunday in Seattle not by poor play or injury, but by a controversial ejection.Forbes was sent back to the locker room after a hit on Seahawks receiver Tyler Lockett, which led many fans to question whether the blow Morgan Burnett Jersey fit the standard for an ejection.Forbes was selected 16th overall out of Mi si sippi State in April's draft, rising up draft boards in the spring despite his thin frame. He was benched in back-to-back games early in the season, struggling mightily against A.J. Brown and D.J. Moore, but the rookie had three pa s deflections in a win over New England last weekend.For a Commanders defense already reeling after trading Montez Sweat and Chase Young at the deadline, the lo s of Forbes against an offense with three intimidating receivers was an especially unwelcome development.MORE: Here's what you need to know about why Forbes was ejected on Sunday.Forbes was ejected after a helmet-to-helmet collision with Lockett on a pa s that went through the receiver's hands.Commanders rookie CB Emmanuel Forbes was ejected for Sheldon Richardson Jersey this hit. The Draft Network (@TheDraftNetwork) After the game, NFL Senior VP of Officiating Walt Anderson told The Washington Post that the hit "was certainly not a bang-bang type play where you have both the defender and the receiver just playing for the ball," arguing that Forbes "went straight to the head" and met the qualifications for ejection.While Forbes was called for an unnece sary roughne s penalty and undeniably made helmet-to-helmet contact, it's fair to question whether the hit met the standard for an ejection. Forbes didn't hit Lockett with the crown of his helmet, instead hitting the receiver with the side of his helmet, and the rookie seemed to be making a play on Lockett in anticipation of the ball being caught. state that a player "may be disqualified if the action is judged by the official(s) to be flagrant." In this case, however, officials on the field only called Forbes for unnece sary roughne s. that the decision to eject Forbes came from league officials in New York, as it often does in that scenario. Based on the rules, it's simply Jarvis Landry Jersey a judgment call to rule Forbes' actions "flagrant."MORE: The decision to eject Forbes despite the rookie not leading with the crown of his helmet created instant controversy.What an outrageous ejection. Emmanuel Forbes just got flagged for a helmet to helmet hit. Fine. I get it.Ejecting him for playing football? Absurd. Grant Paulsen (@granthpaulsen) Emmanuel Forbes was ejected for this hit. I hate the flag bc I watched football in the 80s but I understand it in todays league. BUT AN EJECTION?! When you know for a fact he didnt have time to form intent? Whatre we even doin?! Reese Waters (@reesewaters) No question that should have been a flag on Emmanuel Forbes.But getting ejected from the game?!That's crazy. Scott Abraham (@Scott7news) The NFL has drawn criticism in recent weeks for what some see as unnece sary fines of players, and Forbes' ejection could also be seen as an overzealous attempt by the league to send a me sage about on-field conduct.
https://donovantyrf21983.activosblog.com/28269499/deshaun-watson-stats-with-browns-numbers-dont-paint-pretty-picture-for-start-of-cleveland-tenure
Click here Click here

Report this page